Amazon Q Developer is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it. Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier. Both are listed under Code Autocomplete & Assistants, so this is a like-for-like comparison. Neither is ranked above the other — Flocci carries no sponsored placement.
Amazon Q Developer is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it and is listed for AWS-savvy coding assistant and agents. Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier and is listed for deep whole-codebase context. Both sit in Code Autocomplete & Assistants.
Amazon Q Developer is the cheaper starting point: it is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it, while Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier. Pricing tiers here come from the catalog, not from a promotional page.
Choose Amazon Q Developer if you need AWS-savvy coding assistant and agents; choose Sourcegraph Cody if you need deep whole-codebase context. Flocci AI Tools does not rank one above the other — it shows both feature sets side by side and lets the requirement decide.
| Amazon Q Developer | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing tier | Free tier + paid plans | Paid |
| Free to start | Yes | No |
| Category | Code & Development | Code & Development |
| Type | Code Autocomplete & Assistants | Code Autocomplete & Assistants |
| Listed capabilities |
|
|
| Tags | autocomplete, aws, amazon q, agent, security, free | autocomplete, cody, sourcegraph, codebase, context, free |
| Website | aws.amazon.com | sourcegraph.com |
| Full page | Amazon Q Developer details → | Sourcegraph Cody details → |
| Alternatives | Amazon Q Developer alternatives → | Sourcegraph Cody alternatives → |