Humata vs Marker

Humata is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it. Marker is free, with no paid plan attached. Both are listed under AI OCR & Document Extraction, so this is a like-for-like comparison. Neither is ranked above the other — Flocci carries no sponsored placement.

Humata vs Marker — straight answers

Humata vs Marker: what is the difference?

Humata is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it and is listed for free tier: 60 pages, 10 answers, no card. Marker is free, with no paid plan attached and is listed for apache-2.0 code, 38.7k GitHub stars, converts PDFs/DOCX/PPTX/XLSX to markdown/JSON. Both sit in AI OCR & Document Extraction.

Is Humata or Marker cheaper to start with?

Marker is the cheaper starting point: it is free, with no paid plan attached, while Humata is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it. Pricing tiers here come from the catalog, not from a promotional page.

Which should I choose, Humata or Marker?

Choose Humata if you need free tier: 60 pages, 10 answers, no card; choose Marker if you need apache-2.0 code, 38.7k GitHub stars, converts PDFs/DOCX/PPTX/XLSX to markdown/JSON. Flocci AI Tools does not rank one above the other — it shows both feature sets side by side and lets the requirement decide.

Humata compared with Marker: pricing tier, category, listed capabilities and links.
 HumataMarker
Pricing tierFree tier + paid plansFree
Free to startYesYes
CategoryResearch & LearningResearch & Learning
TypeAI OCR & Document ExtractionAI OCR & Document Extraction
Listed capabilities
  • Free tier: 60 pages, 10 answers, no card
  • Cited answers across many uploaded files at once
  • Paid tiers priced per extra page rather than per seat
  • Apache-2.0 code, 38.7k GitHub stars, converts PDFs/DOCX/PPTX/XLSX to markdown/JSON
  • 76.0% accuracy on the olmocr-bench benchmark
  • Runs on GPU, CPU, or Apple Silicon; optional LLM-boosted accuracy mode
Tagshumata, ask questions of files, document ai, chat with files, free pdf aimarker, datalab, pdf to markdown, open source document parsing, surya ocr
Websitehumata.aigithub.com
Full pageHumata details →Marker details →
AlternativesHumata alternatives →Marker alternatives →

Also worth comparing

All AI OCR & Document Extraction →

dots.ocr (dots.mocr)

AI OCR & Document Extraction
freeNew
  • 3B vision-language model for layout parsing across many scripts
  • Converts charts and diagrams into SVG code
  • Scores 83.9 on olmOCR-bench
  • MIT licensed with free live demo
Visit

LangExtract (Google)

AI OCR & Document Extraction
freeNew
  • Python library extracting structured data from unstructured text with LLMs
  • Maps each extraction to its exact source span
  • Works with Gemini, OpenAI and local Ollama models
  • Interactive HTML visualization of results
Visit

MinerU

AI OCR & Document Extraction
freeNew
  • Parses PDFs, images and Office files into Markdown, JSON, HTML or LaTeX
  • Runs fully locally with OCR, table and formula recognition
  • Free hosted web app at mineru.net plus agent-ready outputs
  • Version 4.0 adds four parsing quality tiers
Visit

olmOCR

AI OCR & Document Extraction
free
  • Apache 2.0 open-source OCR toolkit from Ai2, 19.3k GitHub stars
  • Vision-language-model based, handles equations/tables/multi-column layout
  • Runs at a fraction of commercial OCR cost on a 7B model
Visit

PaddleOCR-VL

AI OCR & Document Extraction
freeNew
  • 1B-parameter document parsing VLM (NaViT encoder + ERNIE-4.5-0.3B)
  • Handles text, tables, formulas, charts and handwriting
  • Supports 109 languages including Hindi and Arabic
  • Apache 2.0; newer PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 available
Visit

DeepSeek-OCR

AI OCR & Document Extraction
freeNew
  • Vision-language OCR that compresses document context optically
  • Document-to-Markdown, layout detection and figure parsing
  • Multiple resolution modes up to 1280x1280
  • MIT license; DeepSeek-OCR2 released Jan 2026
Visit