Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier. Tabby is free, with no paid plan attached. Both are listed under Code Autocomplete & Assistants, so this is a like-for-like comparison. Neither is ranked above the other — Flocci carries no sponsored placement.
Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier and is listed for deep whole-codebase context. Tabby is free, with no paid plan attached and is listed for self-hosted AI coding assistant with completion and chat. Both sit in Code Autocomplete & Assistants.
Tabby is the cheaper starting point: it is free, with no paid plan attached, while Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier. Pricing tiers here come from the catalog, not from a promotional page.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if you need deep whole-codebase context; choose Tabby if you need self-hosted AI coding assistant with completion and chat. Flocci AI Tools does not rank one above the other — it shows both feature sets side by side and lets the requirement decide.
| Sourcegraph Cody | Tabby | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing tier | Paid | Free |
| Free to start | No | Yes |
| Category | Code & Development | Code & Development |
| Type | Code Autocomplete & Assistants | Code Autocomplete & Assistants |
| Listed capabilities |
|
|
| Tags | autocomplete, cody, sourcegraph, codebase, context, free | tabby ml, self hosted copilot, open source code completion, local ai coding assistant, tabby coding assistant |
| Website | sourcegraph.com | tabbyml.com |
| Full page | Sourcegraph Cody details → | Tabby details → |
| Alternatives | Sourcegraph Cody alternatives → | Tabby alternatives → |