Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier. Tabnine is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it. Both are listed under Code Autocomplete & Assistants, so this is a like-for-like comparison. Neither is ranked above the other — Flocci carries no sponsored placement.
Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier and is listed for deep whole-codebase context. Tabnine is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it and is listed for privacy-first completions (can run air-gapped). Both sit in Code Autocomplete & Assistants.
Tabnine is the cheaper starting point: it is freemium — a usable free tier with paid plans above it, while Sourcegraph Cody is paid, with no free tier. Pricing tiers here come from the catalog, not from a promotional page.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if you need deep whole-codebase context; choose Tabnine if you need privacy-first completions (can run air-gapped). Flocci AI Tools does not rank one above the other — it shows both feature sets side by side and lets the requirement decide.
| Sourcegraph Cody | Tabnine | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing tier | Paid | Free tier + paid plans |
| Free to start | No | Yes |
| Category | Code & Development | Code & Development |
| Type | Code Autocomplete & Assistants | Code Autocomplete & Assistants |
| Listed capabilities |
|
|
| Tags | autocomplete, cody, sourcegraph, codebase, context, free | autocomplete, tabnine, private, enterprise, local, free |
| Website | sourcegraph.com | tabnine.com |
| Full page | Sourcegraph Cody details → | Tabnine details → |
| Alternatives | Sourcegraph Cody alternatives → | Tabnine alternatives → |